A 35-year-old Tennessee woman, in a 15-year partnership with her child’s father and mother to their 13-year-old, was recently refused prenatal care during her first appointment—all because her physician objected to her unmarried status. The doctor, citing “conscience,” declined treatment and offered no referral, forcing her to seek care across state lines in Virginia.
This incident marks the first publicized case of denied prenatal care under Tennessee’s Medical Ethics Defense Act (MEDA), a law passed by the Republican-led state government.
The legislation grants healthcare providers, hospitals, insurers, and related entities broad authority to refuse care based on “religious, moral, or ethical” beliefs without requiring referrals to alternative providers.
Critics argue such laws are not about ethics but part of a broader conservative push to restrict access to care, mirroring the fallout from the 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade. Tennessee joins six other states—Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, South Carolina, and Illinois—in enacting “conscience laws” that allow refusals for services like abortion, contraception, and gender-affirming care, even when delays could risk lives.
Four more states (Idaho, Alabama, New Mexico, Washington) have introduced similar bills.
Tennessee’s law, backed by Rep. Bryan Terry (R–Murfreesboro), has drawn sharp rebuke from medical professionals. Dr. Amy Gordon Bono, a state physician, noted its vague language creates dangerous ambiguity: “Urgent but non-emergent issues—common in pregnancy—could face delays, with no clear line between ‘urgent’ and ‘emergent.’”
The impact is exacerbated in rural Tennessee, where 34% of residents (2.4 million) lack adequate healthcare access. Over a third of counties are “maternity care deserts,” and half of rural hospitals no longer offer obstetric services. Since 2012, 10 rural hospitals have closed, with 9 more at risk—compounded by federal cuts to Medicaid under former President Trump’s legislation, which threatens coverage for 300,000 Tennesseans.
Tennessee already has the nation’s highest maternal mortality rate, deepening the stakes. The denied patient voiced fear: “I can’t guarantee my provider values my life over the fetus’s.” She referenced Georgia’s Adriana Smith, who was kept on life support for three months after being declared brain-dead, due to strict abortion laws—stripping her family of decision-making power.
Adding to the crisis, Tennessee faces a “medical exodus”: obstetrics residency applications dropped 21% in 2023–2024, with overall applications down 12%. Young doctors avoid states where evidence-based care may carry legal risks. “Women don’t have fair access,” one OB-GYN said. “Those without it suffer.”
Democrats, including Rep. Gloria Johnson (D-Knoxville), decried the law as “fascism,” arguing it lets providers “refuse treatment to anyone whose lifestyle they disagree with.” Yet critics note both parties share blame: Democrats have failed to counter far-right attacks on healthcare and democracy.
The denied patient, speaking at a town hall, asked: “Why deny care to pregnant women who want babies?” Slamming “pro-life” hypocrisy, she added: “Supporting all lives means insurance, food, protecting marginalized communities.”
As advocates warn, such laws empower reactionary forces to enforce religious and moral standards, eroding reproductive rights and entrenching state-backed discrimination. The fight for healthcare access, they stress, demands working-class mobilization for a system prioritizing human need over profit.
READ MORE
Do I Need Prenatal Care Before 16 Weeks?
